Should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by her next of kin, who signed on her behalcixf? Why or why not?

Please respond to the following scenario:
A Question of Ethics Agreement to Arbitrate.Nellie Lumpkin, who suffered from dementia, was admitted to the Picayune Convalescent Center, a nursing home. Because of her mental condition, her daughter, Beverly McDaniel, signed the admissions agreement. It included a clause requiring the parties to submit any dispute to arbitration. After Lumpkin left the center two years later, she filed a suit against Picayune to recover damages for mistreatment and malpractice. [Covenant Health & Rehabilitation of Picayune, LP v. Lumpkin, 23 So.3d 1092 (Miss. App. 2009)] (Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
(1) Is it ethical for this dispute involving negligent medical care, not a breach of a commercial contract to be forced into arbitration? Why or why not? Discuss whether medical facilities should be able to impose arbitration when there is generally no bargaining over such terms.
(2) Should a person with limited mental capacity be held to the arbitration clause agreed to by her next of kin, who signed on her behalcixf? Why or why not?

• WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
• Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
• CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Related Posts

• Middle School science

• Assignment 2: Ethical (Moral) Relativism

• Case Study Analysis Gender Issues 4-5 pages

• Working in a foreign country

• UNIT VIII Ebola Outbreak in West Africa Public Health Planning Paper