research-writing-services
4.8
research-writing-services
4.9
research-writing-services
4.7

Writing Need Help PLease

Required Text
Williams, C. R., &
Arriago, B. A. (2012). Ethics, crime, and criminal justice (2nd ed.).
Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Final PaperIn an eight- to ten-page paper,
address the following:
Describe and explain two theories/models
of ethics/morality as outlined in the text. One of them should be close to
a model that you believe in or one you can relate to.
Compare the theories/models of ethics/morality. What is
different about them? What is the same?
How do they explain morality or ethics?
Explain, by comparing and contrasting, how each would
view the following: criminal behavior
police corruption
criminal responsibility, punishment, or consequences
Identify a model that explains your moral thinking or
what you believe is a good theory for morality? Explain why you chose this
model. Use an example from your life or personal beliefs to explain your
reasoning.
You may use examples from the text,
your experiences, or criminal justice to explain any of the concepts above and
illustrate your points. Use at least five academic resources other than the
required text to support your claims. Two of theses resources must come from
the Ashford Online Library.
Choose from the following theories/models:
Determinism
Indeterminism
Relativism
Objectivism
Universalism
Egoism
Divine Command Theory
Mutual Advantage
Kohlberg s stages of Moral Development
Consequentialism
Deontology
Virtue Ethics
Utilitarianism
All sources must be properly cited,
and the Final Paper must be formatted according the APA (6th edition) style. If
you would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, review the APA Checklist within the Ashford Writing Center,
located in the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar. Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:
Must be a minimum of eight (8) double-spaced pages in
length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according
to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved style guide.
Must use a minimum of five (5) resources, two from the
Ashford Online Library.
Must provide a cover page that includes: Paper Title
Student s name
Course name and number
Instructor s name
Date submitted
Must address the items found in Final Paper guidelines.
Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct
thesis statement.
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a
conclusion paragraph.
Must use APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the
approved APA style guide to document all sources.
Must include a Reference Page that is completed
according to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved APA style
guide.
Carefully
review the Grading Rubric for the
criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description:

Total Possible Score: 20.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement,
and Conclusion
Total: 1.00
Distinguished
– Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis
statement, and conclusion.
Proficient
– Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and
conclusion. One of these requires improvement.
Basic
– Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.
One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require
improvement.
Below
Expectations – Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis
statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or
conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance
– The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or
lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Two Theories/Models of
Ethics/Morality as Outlined in the Text.
Total: 4.00
Distinguished
– Thoroughly explains two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined in the
text
Proficient – Explains two theories/models of ethics/morality as
outlined in the text. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic
– Briefly explains two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined in the
text. The explanation is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain two theories/models of
ethics/morality as outlined in the text; however the explanation is
significantly underdeveloped, unclear, and/or is missing major components.
Non-Performance
– The explanation of two theories/models of ethics/morality is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Compares and Contrasts the Two Theories/Models
of Ethics/Morality as outlined in the text
Total: 4.00
Distinguished
– Thoroughly compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality as
outlined in the text.
Proficient
– Compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined in
the text. The comparison and contrast may need further development.
Basic
– Briefly compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality as
outlined in the text. The comparison and contrast is underdeveloped.
Below
Expectations – Attempts to compare and contrast two theories/models of
ethics/morality as outlined in the text; however the comparison and contrast is
underdeveloped, unclear, and/or is missing major components.
Non-Performance
– The comparison and contrast of two theories/models of ethics/morality is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Compare Each Theory as it Relates to all three
Identified Topics
Total: 3.00
Distinguished
– Comprehensively compares each theory as it relates to all three identified
topics. The comparison of each theory is supported by relevant examples.
Proficient
– Compares each theory as it relates to all three identified topics. The
comparison of each theory is supported by relevant examples. The comparison is
missing minor details.
Basic
– Briefly compares each theory as it relates to all three identified topics.
The comparison of each theory is somewhat supported by examples. The comparison
is missing major details.
Below
Expectations – Attemps to compares each theory as it relates to all three
identified topics; however, the comparison is not supported by examples,
unclear and/or missing an identified topic.
Non-Performance
– The comparison of each theory as it relates to the identified topics is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Identifies a Theory that Respresents Personal
Morality and Explains why the Theory was Chosen
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Identifies a theory that best represents
personal morality. Provides a thorough explanation of why the theory was
chosen. The explanation is supported by examples from the text or personal
experiences.
Proficient – Identifies a theory that best represents personal
morality. Provides an explanation of why the theory was chosen. The explanation
is supported by examples from the text or personal experiences, but may need
further development.
Basic – Identifies a theory that best represents personal
morality. Provides a brief explanation of why the theory was chosen. The
explanation is supported somewhat by examples from the text or personal
experiences but the explanation is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Identifies a theory that best represents
personal morality and attempts to provide an explanation of why the theory was
chosen; however, the explanation is not supported by examples from the text or
personal experiences, is unclear, and/or is underdeveloped.
Non-Performance
– The identification of a theory that represents personal morality and
explanation of why the theory was chosen are either nonexistent or lack
the components described in the assignment instructions
Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop
sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a
whole.
Proficient
– Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context
of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic
– Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward
discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the
written work.
Below
Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the
topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work,
and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Reading: Relationship to Text
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Analyzes texts for scholarly significance and pertinence within and across
the various disciplines, assessing them according to their contributions and
consequences.
Proficient
– Utilizes texts in the context of scholarship to expand a foundation of
disciplinary knowledge and to raise and discover significant inquiries.
Basic
– Employs texts with the intent and expectation of increasing knowledge.
Below
Expectations – Approaches texts only within the context of assignment.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample
analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized
thoroughly.
Proficient
– Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis
of the topic.
Basic
– Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the
application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Below
Expectations – Displays information from external sources, but such information
may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such
information toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient
– Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough
relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic
– Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information
for a basic understanding.
Below
Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not
deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and
Mechanics
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics,
such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy
to understand.
Proficient
– Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling
and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy
to understand.
Basic
– Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the
reader.
Below
Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics,
such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which
distract the reader.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page,
and reference page.
Proficient
– Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few
minor errors.
Basic
– Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However,
layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below
Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are
frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment
description.
Proficient
– The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment
description.
Basic
– The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the
assignment description.
Below
Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished
– Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling
evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited
correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient
– Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on
the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the
assignment.
Basic
– Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources
may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the
body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below
Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no
support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the
reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are
not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
instructions.
you can change the amount

Related Posts

Quality Writing Features

Price Start $10
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • All Subject Areas
  • Money-Back Guarantee
  • Timely Delivery
  • Originality report
  • Confidentiality guaranteed

Ordering Homework Writing Service

You can get our ideal online homework help services with four easy steps. All you have to do is inform us of your requirements. Immediately we will match with a specialist in your academic discipline. After that, we will track your order, review it to ensure it meets your requirements, and submit it to your email.

research-writing-services

Submit Requirements

Fill in your assignment instructions on the order form

research-writing-services

Writer match

Immediately you contact us for homework help; we will assign your assignment to an academic expert.

research-writing-services

Quality review

We have a team of editors, who will thoroughly review your assignment, ensuring there are no errors before submission

research-writing-services

Get Your Completed Paper

Once we have completed the assignment, we will deliver it to your account. Additionally, we will send a notification to your email.

ordernow

Affordable

Budget-friendly writing services

ordernow

Privacy

We don’t share our client’s information with a third party

ordernow

Unique

We write every assignment from scratch

Amazing Homework Writing Features

Once you consult us for homework help online services, you will attest to why we are among the USA's best essay writing services.

Read on and find out some of the features that make our services superlative.

Free Homework Writing Services

Free plagiarism checker

You can confirm that the content you get is original for free using our plagiarism checker.

Free samples

We offer unlimited access to our essay homework samples.

Free title page and bibliography

Once you place an order, we format it accordingly without demanding additional charges.

Free unlimited revisions

We offer free unlimited revisions until your assignment is of your desired quality..

Free editing and proofreading

We have a team of specialized editors who review your assignment before submission.

Free customer support

You can track the progress of your homework for free.

Request for Homework Writing Service Today!

We have over 500 homework writing experts, ready and waiting to help you improve your writing skills